According to @EmberCN, a single address moved 450 BTC, approximately USD 50.82 million, into Bitget about two hours ago (source: @EmberCN). The on-chain reference address was shared via ARKM Explorer by @EmberCN for verification of the reported deposit (source: @EmberCN). The original post discloses that the update was sponsored by Bitget, as stated by @EmberCN (source: @EmberCN).

According to @OnchainLens, Arthur Hayes deposited 96,628 HYPE, valued at approximately $5.03 million, into Gate and Bybit about an hour before the Sept 21, 2025 post, with the sender activity visible at hyperevmscan.io/address/0xab3fc22f04a12d624cd81923f4ca64e28c089532, source: Onchain Lens on X; HypeEVMScan. According to @OnchainLens, the post also notes Hayes delivered a presentation three weeks earlier outlining a scenario in which HYPE could achieve 126x growth, indicating a previously stated bullish thesis, source: Onchain Lens on X. According to @OnchainLens, the transfer places at least 96,628 HYPE on exchange-linked addresses at Gate and Bybit, increasing immediately tradable supply on those venues for near-term order flow, source: Onchain Lens on X; HypeEVMScan. According to @OnchainLens, traders can track subsequent movements from the referenced address on HypeEVMScan and watch HYPE spot markets on Gate and Bybit for changes in volumes, spreads, and order-book depth following the deposit, source: Onchain Lens on X; HypeEVMScan; Gate; Bybit.

According to @OnchainLens on X, a wallet dormant for 4 years deposited 2,250 ETH worth 10.08 million dollars into Kraken and realized an estimated 10.28 million dollars in profit. According to the same source, the wallet still holds 2,281 ETH valued at 10.22 million dollars at address 0xeA4707CB7B10E8c3a7d2ff1D7F8382B64ec592F1. According to @OnchainLens, the address likely belongs to the same whale that recently deposited 1,757 ETH to Kraken.

According to @OnchainLens citing @nansen_ai, a previously dormant whale deposited 1,757 ETH to Kraken, valued at USD 7.89M, after four years of inactivity. According to @OnchainLens citing @nansen_ai, the whale realized a USD 4M profit on this tranche, implying an estimated cost basis near USD 2,216 per ETH and a transfer valuation near USD 4,493 per ETH based on the reported figures. According to @OnchainLens citing @nansen_ai, the sending address is 0x7B4Cfd1B9560f43c03370C9Aa33621219093eDB5, and the activity was reported on Sep 21, 2025. According to @OnchainLens citing @nansen_ai, the deposit places up to 1,757 ETH in exchange custody at Kraken, which traders often track for near-term liquidity and potential market impact on ETH pairs.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 15.1M ENA valued at about $10.09M to Binance after a 3-month hold, realizing a profit of $5.63M, source: @OnchainLens. According to @OnchainLens, the wallet initially received 15.147M ENA for $4.5M and had sold 47,169 ENA for $21,153 USDC prior to the deposit, source: @OnchainLens. According to @OnchainLens, these figures imply roughly a 125% ROI and an indicative valuation near $0.669 per ENA at the time of the deposit valuation, source: @OnchainLens. According to @OnchainLens, the reported address is 0x5119941df07190f196f928f5087acf3dd9ed41e1, source: @OnchainLens.

According to @lookonchain, Arthur Hayes deposited 1.22M ETHFI (about $1.88M) to Binance and Galaxy Digital for sale roughly 50 minutes ago, with the transaction tied to Arkham address 0x6cd66DbdFe289ab83d7311B668ADA83A12447e21 (source: @lookonchain; Arkham explorer). Based on @lookonchain’s reported figures, the transfer implies an average value of approximately $1.54 per ETHFI, corroborated by the referenced Arkham address (source: @lookonchain; Arkham explorer). The destinations indicate centralized exchange execution, and the intent was explicitly flagged as "for sale" by @lookonchain using Arkham data (source: @lookonchain; Arkham explorer). In light of @lookonchain’s alert and the Arkham-referenced address, traders may monitor ETHFI order books on Binance and Galaxy Digital and watch on-chain movements from 0x6cd66DbdFe289ab83d7311B668ADA83A12447e21 to gauge execution and liquidity impact (source: @lookonchain; Arkham explorer).

According to @lookonchain, a wallet linked to Matrixport deposited 88,434 ETH (approximately $402 million) to Binance about four hours ago after first executing a 100 ETH test transaction valued around $454,000 (source: @lookonchain). The originating address is shown as 0xef2038390E838b8Bf9A2bAE49Ad4BAC52dc9D5f9 on Arkham Intel, which corroborates the transfer flow to Binance (source: Arkham Intel).

According to @EmberCN, a whale deposited 15.1 million ENA into Binance about one hour ago, valued at approximately $10.09 million and showing an estimated profit of $5.61 million (+125%) based on prior entries (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the ENA tranche was accumulated on-chain three months ago after withdrawals from Bybit at a reported cost of about $4.48 million at roughly $0.29 per ENA, with the address shared via Arkham: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x5119941dF07190F196F928f5087acF3dD9eD41E1 (source: @EmberCN, Arkham). Based on the values reported by @EmberCN, the current valuation implies an average ENA price near $0.67 for the transferred amount (source: @EmberCN).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, new wallet 0x395...45500 deposited 9000 ETH valued at 41.55M USD to Binance within the last 15 minutes, with the address referenced on Arkham Intelligence explorer as the wallet source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the wallet accumulated 32356 ETH during June to August 2025 at an average cost of 3027 USD, providing a clear cost basis for potential realized PnL calculations source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, since September 15 the address has transferred a cumulative 15010 ETH approximately 68.8M USD to exchanges, indicating substantial outbound flow from a single holder source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the cumulative transfers equal about 46.4 percent of the wallets 32356 ETH stack, calculated from the reported figures 15010 divided by 32356 source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, based on the stated 41.55M USD value for 9000 ETH, the implied price is roughly 4616 USD per ETH, and if the transferred coins were sold the reported estimated profit would be 23.37M USD for the address source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @EmberCN, ETH whale/institution address 0x3952D69643F7a87237C7fC8bB33f8453C0b45500 accumulated 86,001 ETH via Binance between Jun 22 and Aug 12 at an average buy price of $3,023; source: @EmberCN on X and Arkham address explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x3952D69643F7a87237C7fC8bB33f8453C0b45500. According to @EmberCN, the address began sending ETH back to Binance to take profit, including a recent 9,000 ETH transfer worth $41.56M; source: @EmberCN on X and the Arkham link above. According to @EmberCN, total Binance deposits over the past 3 days reached 15,010 ETH worth $68.77M at an average transfer price of $4,582; source: @EmberCN on X. According to @EmberCN, the implied gross spread between the reported accumulation average ($3,023) and the recent transfer average ($4,582) is $1,559 per ETH, about 51.6%, which equals roughly $23.4M of gross spread on 15,010 ETH; source: calculation based on @EmberCN figures.

According to @OnchainLens, an ETH whale deposited its entire 5,000 ETH into Binance on Sep 18, 2025, with the transaction and wallet 0x5fefafedd49a6099572f24747338193d8864a838 identified via Nansen on-chain data (source: @OnchainLens; data: @nansen_ai). According to @OnchainLens, the deposit was valued at 22.84 million dollars, implying an approximate reference of about 4,568 dollars per ETH at that time (source: @OnchainLens; data: @nansen_ai). According to @OnchainLens, if fully sold the position would realize roughly 5.08 million dollars in profit, inferring an average cost basis near 3,552 dollars per ETH and an approximate return of 28.6 percent based on the reported figures (source: @OnchainLens; data: @nansen_ai). According to @OnchainLens, the move adds 5,000 ETH to exchange-available supply on Binance; traders can monitor follow-up outflows from the same address or Binance executions to confirm any sale (source: @OnchainLens; data: @nansen_ai).

According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, a whale wallet deposited 130,628 TRUMP (about $1.12M) to Bybit after a 7‑month hold, with Nansen tracking a loss of $979K for the position; the sending address is 5HQXBkitS3ycKMKfaJTQdGzs5CGEZyGyMg8fJffngs58 (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens (data: Nansen), the transfer represents an exchange inflow of 130,628 TRUMP to Bybit that on-chain trackers flagged in real time (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen).

According to @lookonchain, a wallet related to @CryptoDonAlt deposited 4,001 ETH worth approximately 18.02 million USD to Binance about 3 hours before the report, with the address and transfer viewable on Arkham at intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xb92792552e590339A7DbF1E0D6114fbc7395c86b source: Lookonchain on X Sep 17, 2025; Arkham. Moving ETH to a centralized exchange makes the balance immediately tradable on the venue, enabling spot or derivatives execution and increasing available exchange-side supply source: Binance Academy What Is a Centralized Exchange. Traders can verify subsequent transfers from the same address cluster and monitor exchange inflows via Arkham to inform short-term risk management source: Arkham.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 2nWbwF deposited 100,000 SOL valued at $23.64M into OKX two hours before the post after receiving the funds from Coinbase Prime, signaling a large single-entity exchange inflow that traders monitor closely for liquidity implications (source: @lookonchain on X, Sep 17, 2025; source: Arkham Intelligence address explorer for 2nWbwF). Research shows that net inflows to centralized exchanges by large holders often correlate with increased sell-side activity in the short term, which traders use to gauge near-term market risk (source: Glassnode Insights; source: CryptoQuant Research). Traders can track OKX spot and derivatives order flow alongside real-time movements of address 2nWbwF to confirm whether the inflow converts into active selling or remains idle on the exchange (source: OKX market data; source: Arkham Intelligence).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 2,600 ETH (about $11.72M) to Kraken and still holds 10,877 ETH (about $49.07M) at address 0x0FeAaF04D371369e5E8125541304ff1c46145434, with figures based on Nansen on-chain data (source: Onchain Lens; Nansen). The transfer size equals roughly 24% of the whale’s current remaining stack, highlighting a notable exchange inflow that traders often watch as potential sell-side liquidity, with the implied reference price near $4,510 per ETH derived from the reported valuations (source: calculation from Onchain Lens figures; Glassnode; CryptoQuant). Historically, rising ETH exchange inflows correlate with higher realized selling and short-term volatility, so monitoring Kraken net flows and order-book depth can help gauge execution risk and liquidity conditions (source: Glassnode; CryptoQuant; Kaiko).

According to @OnchainLens, a wallet that had been inactive for 4 months deposited $15M USDC into HyperLiquid and placed an open buy order for $HYPE between $35.14 and $49 (source: @OnchainLens; Hypurrscan address 0x50dE6ef4D11B263DC2e4547602E963355E17dC81). For traders, the defined price band indicates a visible demand zone and potential buy wall on HyperLiquid, as the order would absorb sell-side liquidity within $35.14–$49 if executed (source: @OnchainLens). Monitoring order fills, amendments, or cancellations at the referenced address and the HyperLiquid order book can inform entry timing and risk levels for HYPE exposure (source: @OnchainLens; Hypurrscan). Position sizing and stops can be mapped around this range given the reported order parameters and potential liquidity concentration in that band (source: @OnchainLens).

According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, a wallet linked to LongLing Capital deposited 4.065M WLD ($7.42M), 1,000 ETH ($4.31M), and 3M USDT into Binance. According to @OnchainLens, the address is 0x5725de59fb21f997cdeb51776e1fd8dea05c28b3 and the transfers place these assets on-exchange for immediate trading. According to @OnchainLens figures, the combined inflow equals roughly $14.73M, and the wallet shows an overall profit of $3.84M.

According to @OnchainDataNerd on X, wallet 0x4fA withdrew 507,000 SOMI from Bybit two days ago at an average entry near $0.60, citing on-chain tracking. According to @OnchainDataNerd on X, the same wallet deposited all 507,000 SOMI back to Bybit about seven hours ago at an average price near $1.58. According to @OnchainDataNerd on X, if the position was fully sold at that average, the realized profit would be about $500,000 with roughly 160% ROI. According to Arkham Intelligence, the address activity can be reviewed at intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x4fAD0AA4D24D5B1e03b6b9a8eA0DA6d6f0E4Dc98.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited the final 2,074 ETH valued at approximately $8.97M to Kraken and booked $6.07M in profit, source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen. The address accumulated a total of 3,289 ETH for $6.43M between Sept 4, 2021 and Dec 9, 2024, implying an average cost near $1,955 per ETH, source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen, calculations based on reported figures. At the time of the final deposit, the 2,074 ETH were valued at about $4,326 per ETH, while the stated profit implies an average realized gain of roughly $1,846 per ETH across the full 3,289 ETH, source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen, calculations based on reported figures. The transfer address is 0x92cbb22a9b9fc01da9914c9b39ed904dd61b859c, source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, three wallets, possibly controlled by one whale, deposited a total of 129M $NEIRO_ETH worth about $9.84M to Bybit roughly one hour before the post, source: @OnchainDataNerd. These deposits represent approximately 13% of the token’s total supply, source: @OnchainDataNerd. The wallets reportedly accumulated the position 4–5 months ago at an average entry price near $0.072, source: @OnchainDataNerd. $NEIRO’s price dropped about 10% immediately after the deposits, source: @OnchainDataNerd. Wallet addresses and transaction links are provided in the source post, source: @OnchainDataNerd.