According to @EmberCN, a wallet deposited 6,294 ETH (about $27.56M) to Bybit roughly 20 minutes ago after withdrawing the same amount from Bybit a month earlier when ETH was $3,779, implying an unrealized profit of about $3.76M at a $4,379 transfer price, source: @EmberCN on X. Historically, large exchange inflows from whales are associated with increased short-term sell pressure and higher intraday volatility in ETH order books, which traders monitor for liquidity shifts, source: CryptoQuant research on exchange inflows and selling pressure.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a wallet the source links to crypto KOL DonAlt deposited 12.97 million WLFI to Binance around two hours ago, valued at approximately $3.2 million; the wallet link was shared via Arkham’s intel explorer domain provided by the source, source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the same address previously participated in WLFI’s second-round public sale with 1,000 ETH, estimated at about $3.25 million, source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the address withdrew 12.97 million unlocked WLFI from a Lockbox before the Binance deposit; if the tokens are sold, the realized profit could be about $2.555 million, source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, there is no corresponding hedge record for this address on HL, while the source notes hedging via other addresses or exchanges cannot be ruled out, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, a single whale deposited 133.33M WLFI valued at $32.21M into Binance from address 0x60229d204c2bddb6e90c1b88bc3cee4494669f20 (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, the wallet spent $10M USDT on January 19, 2025 and received 666.66M WLFI in the presale (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). Based on those figures, the presale cost basis is about $0.015 per WLFI, while the deposited tranche is valued near $0.2416 per WLFI, implying roughly a 16x unrealized gain on that portion (calculation from @OnchainLens figures; data: Nansen). The 133.33M WLFI deposit equals approximately 20 percent of the wallet’s presale allocation, based on the reported 666.66M WLFI received (calculation from @OnchainLens figures; data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, presale participants are currently in profit on WLFI (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Trend Research transferred 1,000,000 PENDLE to Binance about 10 minutes before the post, valuing the deposit at roughly $4.78M at a $4.78 per-token price (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 31, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the position was initiated about a week earlier with a $5.83 withdrawal price, so sending at $4.78 implies a $1.05 per-token or about $1.05M loss if sold at the deposit price, and the source characterizes it as another loss-making sell while questioning broader altcoin de-risking (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 31, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Trend Research deposited 203,105 ENS into Binance, valuing the transfer at approximately $4.72 million with a stated deposit reference price of $23.24. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Aug 31, 2025: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1962154737362776304 According to @ai_9684xtpa, these tokens were previously withdrawn from Binance on 07.23 at $28.82, implying an unrealized loss of about $1.133 million if sold at the cited deposit price. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Aug 31, 2025: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1962154737362776304 According to @ai_9684xtpa, the post also notes that Trend Research’s ENS swing last year appeared to end in a loss, and it included a wallet link for reference. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Aug 31, 2025: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1962154737362776304

According to @OnchainLens, three wallets likely controlled by the same whale deposited 4.338 trillion CHEEMS worth $4.99 million to Binance about 10 hours ago, realizing a $1.58 million profit after a nine-month hold, source: @OnchainLens. The deposits originated from 0xFb5a021b5785f7A6eC451a30d08E9fd5DF4eBcB8, 0x0199C521BE43D20DC906ADEFd5ccCB6c08216ED6, and one additional address, source: @OnchainLens. This constitutes a large inflow of CHEEMS to a centralized exchange that traders can track for liquidity and order book changes, source: @OnchainLens.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, ETH whale James Fickel deposited 39,800 ETH, approximately 172 million dollars, into Coinbase about 7 hours ago, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 30, 2025. Over the past two months, he has cumulatively transferred 43,025 ETH to exchanges, while a Coinbase Prime custody address still holds 57,051 ETH, roughly 247 million dollars, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 30, 2025. The wallet address link for verification is provided in the source post, supporting these on-chain flow figures that traders track as on-exchange supply metrics, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 30, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the PENGU project transferred 200 million PENGU to Binance, valued at $6.11 million (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Over the past two months, the same address has cumulatively moved 775 million PENGU to exchanges, totaling $26.94 million (source: @ai_9684xtpa; on-chain reference: Arkham Intelligence intel.arkm.com). The latest transfer implies an average transfer value of approximately $0.0306 per PENGU, derived from $6.11 million for 200 million tokens (source: calculation based on @ai_9684xtpa data). Across the two-month total, the implied average transfer value is about $0.0347 per PENGU using $26.94 million over 775 million tokens (source: calculation based on @ai_9684xtpa data). Traders can monitor the cited wallet and subsequent exchange inflows via Arkham Intelligence to track near-term exchange-side liquidity for PENGU (source: Arkham Intelligence intel.arkm.com).

According to @EmberCN, a 2013-era Bitcoin whale that accumulated 5,000 BTC transferred 750 BTC worth $83.11M to Binance within the past hour, source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 27, 2025. According to @EmberCN, a total of 1,750 BTC worth $185M has been deposited to Binance over the last nine months at an average transfer price of $106,011, source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 27, 2025. According to @EmberCN, the address still holds 3,250 BTC valued at $359M, indicating ongoing exchange inflow risk monitoring for traders, source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 27, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, a Bitcoin OG deposited 968 BTC valued at $106.44M to Hyperliquid roughly 30 minutes before the post, which implies a per-BTC valuation near $110,000 based on the reported figures (source: Lookonchain on X, Aug 26, 2025). The same wallet is selling BTC to buy ETH spot on Hyperliquid, indicating an active BTC-to-ETH rotation by this large holder (source: Lookonchain on X, Aug 26, 2025).

According to Onchain Lens, a whale deposited 1,962 ETH, valued at approximately $9.38 million, into OKX from address 0xf3c7D5b83DCf6F297E4B1f5A525C1a3eE45D5585 on August 25, 2025. Source: Onchain Lens on X, Aug 25, 2025. The wallet held the ETH for over 11 months and realized about $4.7 million in profit; this implies an estimated cost basis near $2.39k per ETH, derived from the reported notional and profit figures. Source: Onchain Lens on X, Aug 25, 2025; calculation derived from Onchain Lens figures. Large exchange inflows are commonly tracked by traders as a potential sell-pressure proxy because moving coins to centralized exchanges increases readily sellable supply. Source: CryptoQuant Metrics Guide on Exchange Inflows; Glassnode Insights on Exchange Net Position Change. Traders can monitor OKX ETH order flow and broader ETH exchange netflows to gauge whether additional supply follows this deposit and to assess short-term liquidity and volatility risk. Source: CryptoQuant Metrics Guide on Exchange Flows; Glassnode Insights on Exchange Activity.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 1,962 ETH worth about $9.38M to OKX and realized approximately $4.7M in profit, with the sending address 0xf3c7D5b83DCf6F297E4B1f5A525C1a3eE45D5585, source: @OnchainLens. According to @OnchainLens, the ETH was reportedly held for over 11 years before the deposit, source: @OnchainLens. Large inflows to centralized exchanges are historically monitored as potential sell-side supply by on-chain analysts, so traders may watch OKX spot and derivatives flow around ETH for confirmation, source: Glassnode Academy.

According to @EmberCN, HashKey Capital transferred 5.412 million MNT worth about $7.42 million into Bybit roughly 15 minutes before the post time on Aug 20, 2025, with the referenced on-chain address provided via intel.arkm.com (source: @EmberCN on X; source: Arkham Intelligence address explorer). @EmberCN adds that these MNT were originally withdrawn from Bybit to an on-chain address eight months earlier in Dec 2024 and are now moving back onto the exchange (source: @EmberCN on X). The notional value cited increased from $6.33 million at the time of withdrawal to $7.42 million now, a change of $1.09 million (source: @EmberCN on X). For trading, a 5.412 million MNT inflow increases immediately available supply on Bybit; traders typically monitor spot order-book depth, funding rates, and open interest around such deposits to assess liquidity and positioning (source: @EmberCN on X for the deposit details; source: Bybit market data and public API for order book and derivatives metrics).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 3,492 ETH worth $15.57M into Binance in the past 24 hours, with the trade sequence showing a reported profit of $17.37M, source: @OnchainLens. The same entity initially withdrew 5,800 ETH worth $10.25M from Binance two years ago, source: @OnchainLens. The whale still holds 2,650 ETH currently valued at $12M, source: @OnchainLens. Addresses for the related wallets were provided by the source, source: @OnchainLens.

According to @lookonchain, ARK Invest transferred 1,268 BTC (about $148.88 million) to Coinbase roughly 30 minutes before their post (source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence). The transaction was flagged using Arkham Intelligence entity labels that attribute the sender to ARK Invest and the recipient to Coinbase, confirming it as an exchange inflow rather than a self-custody move (source: Arkham Intelligence via @lookonchain). Large BTC deposits to centralized exchanges increase immediately available on-exchange supply and are monitored by traders as potential catalysts for short-term volatility (source: CryptoQuant). Near term, market participants commonly track Coinbase order book depth and the Coinbase Premium Index around such inflows to assess whether sell pressure materializes (source: CryptoQuant).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 39,875 SOL to Bybit valued at about $8.19M, with the transfer details referenced via Arkham Intelligence’s address explorer (source: @OnchainLens; Arkham Intelligence). The same entity initially received 39,875 SOL from Bybit five months ago for roughly $5.26M (source: @OnchainLens; Arkham Intelligence). Based on those reported figures, the position shows an approximately $2.93M profit with an implied current price near $205 per SOL versus an estimated cost basis near $132, equating to about a 56% five-month gain (source: @OnchainLens; calculations from stated amounts).

According to @lookonchain, whale CMJiHu deposited 130,000 SOL valued at about $26.45M into Binance, OKX, Bybit, and Gate.io roughly 3 hours ago. Source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1955840591251783733 The reported transactions constitute a multi-exchange inflow that adds 130,000 SOL to centralized venues named, a trading-relevant change in available supply for SOL pairs across those order books. Source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1955840591251783733

According to @lookonchain, three wallets moved a combined 14,942 ETH (about $64.38M) to Binance within the past hour after unstaking, with the author suggesting the wallets may belong to a single whale; the transfers are referenced via Arkham Intelligence address explorers linked in the post. Source: X post by @lookonchain https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1955194486818214128; Arkham Intelligence explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer (specific address links provided in the author’s post). For trading context, increased ETH inflows to centralized exchanges are commonly monitored as potential sell-side supply that can pressure price in the short term. Source: Glassnode Academy on exchange flows https://academy.glassnode.com/indicators/exchanges/exchange-net-position-change.

According to Lookonchain, Ethereum co-founder Jeffrey Wilcke deposited 9,840 ETH (about $9.22 million) to Kraken roughly an hour ago (source: Lookonchain on X, Aug 9, 2025). Lookonchain also reports that three months ago Wilcke transferred 105,737 ETH into eight newly created wallets (source: Lookonchain on X, Aug 9, 2025). The address currently holds 95,897 ETH valued around $401.6 million (source: Lookonchain on X, Aug 9, 2025). From a trading perspective, large exchange-bound transfers are commonly monitored as potential short-term sell-side supply signals, as higher exchange inflows have historically been associated with increased selling pressure (source: CryptoQuant research on Exchange Inflows).

According to @rovercrc, a dormant whale deposited 5,000 ETH valued at $21.14 million into Binance after five years of inactivity, and the address has realized a total profit of $45.38 million. According to @rovercrc, this move represents an exchange inflow of 5,000 ETH to Binance that is being tracked in real time.